In mid-2025, Cluely — one of the most buzzed-about AI interview assistants — suffered a security breach that exposed personal information, interview transcripts, and screenshots of more than 83,000 users. For a tool whose entire value proposition is discretion during job interviews, it's hard to imagine a more fundamental failure.
If you're looking for a Cluely alternative that does the same thing without putting your data at risk, here's the honest breakdown.
Why Cluely is hard to recommend right now
- The 2025 data breach exposed 83k+ users' transcripts, screenshots, and personal information. Interview content is among the most sensitive data you generate — names, employers, salary discussions, technical IP.
- Origin story. Cluely started as "Interview Coder," built by a Columbia student to cheat technical interviews, who was then expelled from Columbia over it. The tool was rebranded and raised $5.3M in venture funding. The ethics stance has always been contested.
- Detection risk. Independent tests have found the Cluely overlay visible during screen sharing in some scenarios — precisely the failure mode an "invisible" AI tool cannot have.
- Output quality. Multiple reviews have noted that the free tier caps output at 100 characters and 5 responses per day, and paid output can be generic.
At $20/month, Cluely is one of the cheaper tools — but "cheap" doesn't matter if your interview transcripts end up on a public dump.
What to look for in a privacy-first alternative
A safer real-time AI interview assistant should check these boxes:
- No long-term storage of interview content. Transcripts should be ephemeral, not sitting in a database for years.
- Encrypted sessions end-to-end. Your interview audio and overlay output should not travel in plaintext.
- Clean breach history. No known data incidents.
- Reliable invisibility. The overlay must be provably hidden from screen-sharing composition.
- Transparent company behind it. Not a rebranded expulsion story.
GirGit AI: what it does differently
| Property | Cluely | GirGit AI |
|---|---|---|
| Known data breaches | ⚠️ 83k users (2025) | None |
| Origin | Rebranded "Interview Coder" | Built as a privacy-conscious tool from day one |
| Interview content retention | Unclear policy | Minimal — processed locally where possible |
| Invisible on screen share | Inconsistent in tests | Consistently hidden |
| Hides from Alt+Tab & taskbar | Unclear | Yes |
| Free trial | 5 responses/day capped | 10 minutes full access |
| Pricing | $20/month flat | ₹5/min pay-per-use |
| Payment rails | Card only | UPI, debit, credit |
GirGit AI's design emphasizes local processing of interview content where possible, minimal server-side retention, and a clear policy on data usage (outlined in our privacy policy). The tool was not built as a cheating app that later pretended to be legitimate — it was built from day one as a professional-grade real-time assistant.
The ethics question, briefly
Any real-time AI interview assistant sits on an ethics spectrum. Using AI to surface memory, structure answers, or check syntax is closer to using notes than to cheating. Using AI to hand you answers to questions you couldn't possibly answer yourself is closer to fraud. The tool is the same; the usage changes the line.
The practical test: if you couldn't defend your answer under follow-up questioning, the AI is doing more than assisting. Used well, a real-time assistant makes you sound like your most-prepared self — not someone you aren't. GirGit AI's resume-context design pushes in that direction by grounding answers in what's actually on your resume.
Other alternatives to Cluely
For completeness: LockedIn AI ($49.99–$69.99/mo) and Parakeet AI (credit-based) are both reasonable privacy-wise with no known breaches, though they're more expensive than Cluely. Final Round AI is cheaper-looking on paper but has documented billing and reliability issues. Cluely's own open-source clones (like "Natively") have appeared on GitHub but are harder to set up and not production-grade.
For most candidates who want "Cluely-like functionality without Cluely's baggage," GirGit AI is the pragmatic choice.
The bottom line
Using an AI interview assistant is a personal call. Using one that has already lost control of 83,000 users' transcripts is a harder call to defend. If you want real-time AI help with a clean security record, transparent pricing, and consistent invisibility — that's what GirGit AI is built for.
The whole point of an "invisible" tool is trust. Once the trust is broken — through breaches, detection failures, or origin stories — the invisibility does not matter.